Priestly
aptly conveys the difference in attitude between the older and younger
generation, In accordance with Eva Smith’s death. As we can see, Priestly shows
the older generation as confident, stylish yet class conscious. On the other
hand, the younger generation is aware of their responsibility as being
perceptive and not giving in to social segregation. The older generation are
represented by the characters Mr Birling in contrast with the younger
generation characterised by Sheila, Eric Birling and Gerald Croft.
As seen in
Act 1, Mr Birling is extremely selfish. He wants to protect his reputation and
safeguard Birling and Co. He does not agree with the younger generation’s
viewpoint when they condemn him for firing va Smith. In defiance he says, “Rubbish! If you don’t come down sharply on
some of these people, they’d soon be asking for the Earth.”
This clearly
shows that he is unable to accept responsibility for his part n Eva Smith’s
death. In addition to this, Mr Birling is very proud of his achievement, since
he has worked his way up the corporate ladder of success. He is a boastful
character who threatens the inspector with his influential connections, so as
to make the inspector realise his social standing. This can be observed when he
makes a remark to the inspector,“Perhaps I ought to warn you he is an old
friend of mine…”
The word
‘warn’ implies a threatening attitude or nature. Mr Birling shows to a less
influential person. Further on, we are able to see Mr Birling’s attitude
towards Eva Smith. Rather angrily, he comments to Eric,” It’s about time you learn to face a new responsibility.” This
implies that Mr Birling expects the younger generation to face responsibility
while he prefers to shirk his responsibility.
Through Mr Birling, Priestley is trying to convey to the audience that
the older generation is more concerned about their social status in protecting
their reputation and is prejudice towards the less fortunate ( Eva Smith). The
audience is able to see Mr Birling in negative light as Mr Birling, whose
business is actually dependant on the labour class chooses to ignore them.
While Mr
Birling and Inspector Goole are continuing their conversation, Eric come in. It
is evident that there is tension in Eric’s relationship with his father. Eric
is embarrassed and feeling awkward when his father lectures him and Gerald
saying, “ A man has to mind his own
business and look after himself.” When the Inspector pinpoints that Mr
Birling should accept responsibility for Eva Smith’s death, the latter denies
the same prompting Eric to sarcastically comment, “ And you were saying that a
man has to look after himself.” This shows that Eric is upset with his parents
when they refuse to accept responsibility. It is further noticed that Eric
Being of the younger generation is open to new ideas and sympathetic towards
the working class. He supports Eva Smith as being a good worker because she was
aggressive towards her rights as a labourer. Eric says, “ She’d a bit more
spirited than the other…” This shows that he supports the worker’s cause and
does not believe in class distinction. Priestley tries to show te younger
generation with positive impression as
they would have been more sympathetic towards the workers and more humane in
their thinking as opposed to the older generation than can only think of
profits.
Sheila makes
an entry after Eric has made his point clear. Sheila may have considered the
condition at the workers. However, she shows compassion instinctively as she is
horrified over her father’s treatment of Eva Smith. “But these girl’s aren’t
cheap labour – they’re people.” This depicts that Sheila is beginning to change
as she sees her father in unfavourable light. Later, Sheila is ashamed by her
own part in Eva’s story. She feels full of guilt for her actions and blames
herself for being responsible. “…..it was my own fault…I’m telling the truth. I
accept you’ve done things you’re ashamed at too” This shows Sheila is able to
examine her conscience and be ashamed of her role in Eva’s death. She is wiser
because she has admitted her responsibility and accepted her own wrongdoings.
Through this, Priestley is able to convey the fact that although the younger
generation tend to behave irresponsible towards the lower class women like Eva
. They can experience a self -realisation that they are guilty. As we can see Sheila is full of remorse.
Gerald knew Daisy Renton when the Inspector
mentioned Eva Smith’s name. He is an aristocrat, similar to Mr Birling, who
wants to protect his own interest. He is not willing to take responsibility of
his hand in the girl’s death because he wants to pretend he never new her.
“There is nothing to be concerned,” I’ve never known Eva Smith!” This shows
that he feels that if he was to get involved, he will lose his status quo and
although he may be sympathetic, he looks at Eva Smith at being a vulnerable
woman who could amuse and entertain him. Gerald’s denial plays a crucial part
in showcasing class distinction. “I don’t come in this suicide business.”
Through this we can see Gerald’s influenced by his aristocratic roots and never
examined his conscience by admitting his fault. To him Eva was a mistress who
was pretty and could be discarded at will. Priestley is trying to show that the
upper classes abused the lower classes without having any moral responsibility.
People like Gerald viewed Eva as a mistress because poor women during that time
had no choice but to turn to prostitution when they faced a loss of a job.
The
inspector acts as a moral mouthpiece to make the audience aware that it is our
personal responsibility for our own action. We need to be responsible for the
society we live in. Prejudice and arrogance that exists in the older generation
prevents them from being socially conscious and taking responsibility for their
actions as they are influenced by their status and personal interests. The
younger generation are more optimistic as they are open to new ideas and
thoughts; sympathise towards the labour force; are honest to admit their faults
and lastly are remorseful of their wrongdoings.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletehow much marks out of 30 would you give this?
ReplyDeleteomds defo 30
ReplyDeleteVery nice piece, helped me get inspiration for my homework.
ReplyDeletethe part when you start to speak about Sheila doesn't make sense
ReplyDelete